Popular Post

cat in hat book pages

images ook The Cat in the Hat, cat in hat book pages. Cat in the Hat Beginner Book
  • Cat in the Hat Beginner Book



  • geniousatwork
    09-22 09:00 PM
    I applied on Aug 18 and got approval email on Sep 2....awaiting AP in mail

    I applied for my AP on Aug 24th. I haven't seen any update on the case. May I know when you guys applied for it?





    wallpaper Cat in the Hat Beginner Book cat in hat book pages. To create a childrens ook is revolutionized the hatleapfrog tag For kids
  • To create a childrens ook is revolutionized the hatleapfrog tag For kids



  • akred
    06-03 02:17 PM
    akred,

    I am not refuting that statistics is a discipline within Mathematics. Just that that particular DOL web page doesn't give the list of disciplines considered as STEM.

    The disciplines are in the right hand column on that page.

    I think what you are looking for is information classified by degree name. That level of detail is not available.





    cat in hat book pages. Cat in the Hat golden ook
  • Cat in the Hat golden ook



  • roseball
    06-29 03:26 PM
    As per the blog from www.immigration-law.com, today is the last day USCIS will accept any Premium Processing requests for I-140s...

    06/29/2007: Today Will be the Last Date for I-140 PPS Filing

    USCIS has confirmed that the last day when they will accept the I-907 premium processing request for I-140 petition is today, June 29, 2007. Obviously "accept" means physically received or e-filed within today. Again, it is uncertain when the PPS was delivered to the postal station today but not picked up today. This is the risk involving delivery of documents to the Service Center via U.S. Express Mail. Such Express Mail remains in the postal station until it is picked up by the Service Center crew.





    2011 To create a childrens ook is revolutionized the hatleapfrog tag For kids cat in hat book pages. voting cat hat read ook happy
  • voting cat hat read ook happy



  • vedicman
    01-04 08:34 AM
    Ten years ago, George W. Bush came to Washington as the first new president in a generation or more who had deep personal convictions about immigration policy and some plans for where he wanted to go with it. He wasn't alone. Lots of people in lots of places were ready to work on the issue: Republicans, Democrats, Hispanic advocates, business leaders, even the Mexican government.

    Like so much else about the past decade, things didn't go well. Immigration policy got kicked around a fair bit, but next to nothing got accomplished. Old laws and bureaucracies became increasingly dysfunctional. The public grew anxious. The debates turned repetitive, divisive and sterile.

    The last gasp of the lost decade came this month when the lame-duck Congress - which struck compromises on taxes, gays in the military andarms control - deadlocked on the Dream Act.

    The debate was pure political theater. The legislation was first introduced in 2001 to legalize the most virtuous sliver of the undocumented population - young adults who were brought here as children by their parents and who were now in college or the military. It was originally designed to be the first in a sequence of measures to resolve the status of the nation's illegal immigrants, and for most of the past decade, it was often paired with a bill for agricultural workers. The logic was to start with the most worthy and economically necessary. But with the bill put forward this month as a last-minute, stand-alone measure with little chance of passage, all the debate accomplished was to give both sides a chance to excite their followers. In the age of stalemate, immigration may have a special place in the firmament.

    The United States is in the midst of a wave of immigration as substantial as any ever experienced. Millions of people from abroad have settled here peacefully and prosperously, a boon to the nation. Nonetheless, frustration with policy sours the mood. More than a quarter of the foreign-born are here without authorization. Meanwhile, getting here legally can be a long, costly wrangle. And communities feel that they have little say over sudden changes in their populations. People know that their world is being transformed, yet Washington has not enacted a major overhaul of immigration law since 1965. To move forward, we need at least three fundamental changes in the way the issue is handled.

    Being honest about our circumstances is always a good place to start. There might once have been a time to ponder the ideal immigration system for the early 21st century, but surely that time has passed. The immediate task is to clean up the mess caused by inaction, and that is going to require compromises on all sides. Next, we should reexamine the scope of policy proposals. After a decade of sweeping plans that went nowhere, working piecemeal is worth a try at this point. Finally, the politics have to change. With both Republicans and Democrats using immigration as a wedge issue, the chances are that innocent bystanders will get hurt - soon.

    The most intractable problem by far involves the 11 million or so undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States. They are the human legacy of unintended consequences and the failure to act.

    Advocates on one side, mostly Republicans, would like to see enforcement policies tough enough to induce an exodus. But that does not seem achievable anytime soon, because unauthorized immigrants have proved to be a very durable and resilient population. The number of illegal arrivals dropped sharply during the recession, but the people already here did not leave, though they faced massive unemployment and ramped-up deportations. If they could ride out those twin storms, how much enforcement over how many years would it take to seriously reduce their numbers? Probably too much and too many to be feasible. Besides, even if Democrats suffer another electoral disaster or two, they are likely still to have enough votes in the Senate to block an Arizona-style law that would make every cop an alien-hunter.

    Advocates on the other side, mostly Democrats, would like to give a path to citizenship to as many of the undocumented as possible. That also seems unlikely; Republicans have blocked every effort at legalization. Beyond all the principled arguments, the Republicans would have to be politically suicidal to offer citizenship, and therefore voting rights, to 11 million people who would be likely to vote against them en masse.

    So what happens to these folks? As a starting point, someone could ask them what they want. The answer is likely to be fairly limited: the chance to live and work in peace, the ability to visit their countries of origin without having to sneak back across the border and not much more.

    Would they settle for a legal life here without citizenship? Well, it would be a huge improvement over being here illegally. Aside from peace of mind, an incalculable benefit, it would offer the near-certainty of better jobs. That is a privilege people will pay for, and they could be asked to keep paying for it every year they worked. If they coughed up one, two, three thousand dollars annually on top of all other taxes, would that be enough to dent the argument that undocumented residents drain public treasuries?

    There would be a larger cost, however, if legalization came without citizenship: the cost to the nation's political soul of having a population deliberately excluded from the democratic process. No one would set out to create such a population. But policy failures have created something worse. We have 11 million people living among us who not only can't vote but also increasingly are afraid to report a crime or to get vaccinations for a child or to look their landlord in the eye.



    Much of the debate over the past decade has been about whether legalization would be an unjust reward for "lawbreakers." The status quo, however, rewards everyone who has ever benefited from the cheap, disposable labor provided by illegal workers. To start to fix the situation, everyone - undocumented workers, employers, consumers, lawmakers - has to admit their errors and make amends.

    The lost decade produced big, bold plans for social engineering. It was a 10-year quest for a grand bargain that would repair the entire system at once, through enforcement, ID cards, legalization, a temporary worker program and more. Fierce cloakroom battles were also fought over the shape and size of legal immigration. Visa categories became a venue for ideological competition between business, led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and elements of labor, led by the AFL-CIO, over regulation of the labor market: whether to keep it tight to boost wages or keep it loose to boost growth.

    But every attempt to fix everything at once produced a political parabola effect. As legislation reached higher, its base of support narrowed. The last effort, and the biggest of them all, collapsed on the Senate floor in July 2007. Still, the idea of a grand bargain has been kept on life support by advocates of generous policies. Just last week, President Obama and Hispanic lawmakers renewed their vows to seek comprehensive immigration reform, even as the prospects grow bleaker. Meanwhile, the other side has its own designs, demanding total control over the border and an enforcement system with no leaks before anything else can happen.

    Perhaps 10 years ago, someone like George W. Bush might reasonably have imagined that immigration policy was a good place to resolve some very basic social and economic issues. Since then, however, the rhetoric around the issue has become so swollen and angry that it inflames everything it touches. Keeping the battles small might increase the chance that each side will win some. But, as we learned with the Dream Act, even taking small steps at this point will require rebooting the discourse.

    Not long ago, certainly a decade ago, immigration was often described as an issue of strange bedfellows because it did not divide people neatly along partisan or ideological lines. That world is gone now. Instead, elements of both parties are using immigration as a wedge issue. The intended result is cleaving, not consensus. This year, many Republicans campaigned on vows, sometimes harshly stated, to crack down on illegal immigration. Meanwhile, many Democrats tried to rally Hispanic voters by demonizing restrictionists on the other side.

    Immigration politics could thus become a way for both sides to feed polarization. In the short term, they can achieve their political objectives by stoking voters' anxiety with the scariest hobgoblins: illegal immigrants vs. the racists who would lock them up. Stumbling down this road would produce a decade more lost than the last.

    Suro in Wasahington Post

    Roberto Suro is a professor of journalism and public policy at the University of Southern California. surorob@gmail.com



    more...


    cat in hat book pages. The Cat in the Hat
  • The Cat in the Hat



  • skagitswimmer
    June 19th, 2005, 01:19 PM
    and here is a version with FM 3 and a touch of level and contrast adjustment.

    by the way - the avocet portrait is great.

    OT : Jet Airways Chennai to JFK via Brussels [Archive] - Immigration Voice

    View Full Version : OT : Jet Airways Chennai to JFK via Brussels






    cat in hat book pages. Cat in the Hat
  • Cat in the Hat



  • tikka
    08-07 11:48 AM
    [QUOTE=tnite;141114]Please join us for a tri state lunch meet. We would like to start working on volunteers/ mobilizing members for the DC rally. Even if you cannot take the day off and come to DC please come by for the lunch. We could really use help with banners/posters/ and ideas to make this a success.

    WHEN: Saturday AUGUST 11th

    LOCATION- 148 E 48TH St, New York, NY 10017 (between Lexington and Third Avenues.)



    SORRY FOR THE CONFUSION!! LUNCH IS AT NOON!!!



    more...


    cat in hat book pages. +to+make+a+cat+in+the+hat+
  • +to+make+a+cat+in+the+hat+



  • texcan
    02-20 04:10 PM
    Thanks for answering my question. But is it not a huge difference between what I earn and what is mentioned in the LC (almost 40k) ??

    GC is for future job, this pay is for skill set that will be used for FUTURE JOB,
    it has nothing to do with your current job even if it is same job title.

    Donot worry for stuff you donot have control over. It was done in past, you are fine, you cant do anything about it anyways now, or even if you had known about this in past.
    LCA Salary is determined by Labor office, those great folks always come up with salary ...that no one pays.

    Talk to your employer and ask about seeking higher salary. Most folks get huge jump ( in normal market) when they get their EAD since employer knows now they will move somewhere else.

    Donot panic about everyting.
    HTH





    2010 Cat in the Hat golden ook cat in hat book pages. ook The Cat in the Hat,
  • ook The Cat in the Hat,



  • cagedcactus
    11-01 07:07 AM
    WD many thanks for arranging yesterday's meeting. Truly informative and very much helpful.
    I thank the core on behalf of Michigan group, and truly appreciate the time they are putting into this.
    We will not let you down. we will fight at local level until this monster is brought down.
    Those who havent joined yet, please do so right now. Do it for yourself, and your family.



    more...


    cat in hat book pages. cat in hat book cover. The latest Oddmen ook.
  • cat in hat book cover. The latest Oddmen ook.



  • sidbee
    01-02 08:01 PM
    I really wish , i could file my 485 in 2 years, If not i am moving to UK.
    Another question , being a junior i have, How does IV use our donations to compel USCIS/DOS to do things in favour of LEGAL IMMIGRANTS?





    hair voting cat hat read ook happy cat in hat book pages. The Cat in the Hat LITE
  • The Cat in the Hat LITE



  • kondur_007
    03-29 06:06 PM
    Good; So this is what I understand:

    You are working for employer A. Before the expiry of I 94, you applied for extension with employer A and that extension is still pending.
    After the expiry of I 94 (and pending extension) you applied for employer B, that did get approved but came without attached I 94.

    You are still working for employer A and that extension with employer A is still pending.

    If above facts are correct, you may be fine; however question is, why is your extension with employer A still pending; and what can you do about that. Depending on specifics of your case it may be time to make it premium or simply leave the country and return back on employer B's H1B and work for that employer.
    You still need to talk to a good attorney to see which one of the above options are good for you.

    Good Luck.



    more...


    cat in hat book pages. cat in hat book cover. Cat In The Hat Book Pictures
  • cat in hat book cover. Cat In The Hat Book Pictures



  • rabs
    04-12 06:30 AM
    I paper filed Last week and I wrote the receipt date of previous EAD.





    hot The Cat in the Hat cat in hat book pages. cat in hat book cover. Cat In The Hat Book Pictures
  • cat in hat book cover. Cat In The Hat Book Pictures



  • neeidd
    08-06 12:20 PM
    My husband and I are July 2 Neb transfer to TX and we got approval email on 8/1. PD is 2005 Dec.
    Does your receipt number starts with SRC#? I don't see any non SRC# approvals so far at TSC. Please share your PD also.

    Thanks



    more...


    house Dr Suess#39;s The Cat in the Hat cat in hat book pages. mini-ook Photos page cat
  • mini-ook Photos page cat



  • Harivinder
    04-12 02:40 PM
    Hi Friends and Administrators,

    I have a suggestion. I am sure the administrators here have much better ideas than mine but I would request administrators to please read this suggestion with an open mind. It might be useful for the community.
    I am sure we have enough members working for big companies like Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Intel etc. The past experiences tell us that congress listens to these companies more than us even if we are making a valid point on the legal immigration issues. The irony here is that these companied care for H1 visa expansion not green card quota expansion. These big companies do not realize the benefit of green card quota expansion to them.
    Let me prove how. A large proportion of the immigration community is working for small companies as consultants. Their immigration status makes changing jobs very difficult. Now I am sure if the people stuck in GC process get there GC thousands of people will not be forced to work for consultant companies and will look for permanent jobs. And these big companies are sitting on the top of the most desired companies to work for. These thousands of consultants will be more than happy to work for these big companies after they get there GC.
    My point here is that if we can have these Companies speak for us, our voices can be heard by congress.
    How this can be done: If immigrants working for these companies as consultants or permanent can start a chain of email and send a signed copy with hundred of signatures to the management, management might think of putting these points across to congress.
    The contents of this email should be simple and achievable. Like
    1. Recapture of unused Visas.
    2. Get rid of the country quota. (This one is difficult but very beneficial).
    3. Except US graduates form quota. (This one is controversial in IV community, but if US graduates are out of the quota every one is benefited. US graduates will be benefited more, but others will be benefited because there will be less number of people to share the quota. I mention this one because this point can get big support for the universities also, and I am sure congress does not ignore a voice coming form the universities.
    About increasing the quota it is difficult and will not help much if the country quota is still exists.

    If the email submitted to the management contain thousands of signatures from immigrants working for here company and people who support these immigrants in the company management and people like Bill Gates might talk to the congress to hemp us.

    May be it is 2 cents suggestion but I would like the administrators to think out it with a open mind.

    Thanks,





    tattoo Cat in the Hat cat in hat book pages. cat in hat book cover. The Cat In The Hat Book; The Cat In The Hat Book
  • cat in hat book cover. The Cat In The Hat Book; The Cat In The Hat Book



  • andycool
    01-06 04:54 PM
    Thanks so much for taking time to respond. I have e-filed my application and am sending all supporting documents today. It appears that the processing time is about 90 days, so I might not be able to leave in Feb afterall. But at least I will have my Travel document ready for any future travel plans.
    Best,
    Pria


    Pria

    send 2 photos too, even though the application tells do not send photos ( e filed ) , I suggest you to send photos.

    thanks



    more...


    pictures +to+make+a+cat+in+the+hat+ cat in hat book pages. Скриншот The Cat in the Hat
  • Скриншот The Cat in the Hat



  • mrdelhiite
    07-13 08:29 AM
    and marry a celebraty

    or work hard and support IV :)
    -M
    PS: good things come to those who wait





    dresses cat in hat book cover. Cat In The Hat Book Pictures cat in hat book pages. the cat in the hat coloring
  • the cat in the hat coloring



  • morchu
    04-21 02:45 PM
    Try to be "truthful" in the "intent".

    You are NOT loosing "anything" by filing a second LC at the new location. You keep your priority date, and PERM is fast and I-140 processing time is 4 months or so.

    If they see a chance of "fraud" intention, USCIS may call you for interview and if they were able to interpret your intentions as fraud, it is going to be really costly.

    Also you need full support from your employer, and might need to show that the offered "permanent position as mentioned in LC" exists at the time of 485 filing.

    -Morchu

    [QUOTE=fromnaija;335920]Yes, if you are sure of moving back to the job location specified in the Labor Certification you may not have to restart the process. If you know you will not move back, youand your employer will be commiting immigration fraud if a new LC is not applied.

    what kind of evidence you need to provide to show the intention that you will move back to the original location!



    more...


    makeup cat in hat book cover. The latest Oddmen ook. cat in hat book pages. Dr Suess#39;s The Cat in the Hat
  • Dr Suess#39;s The Cat in the Hat



  • espoir
    07-27 04:10 PM
    They would have to leave US and re-enter on H-4 visa to be on H4

    If I-485 is rejected, can you switch back to H4 from EAD without going out of USA?





    girlfriend cat in hat book cover. The Cat In The Hat Book; The Cat In The Hat Book cat in hat book pages. concrete hats printable cat in
  • concrete hats printable cat in



  • GoneSouth
    03-15 05:25 PM
    If the first labor is done through PERM, can the 2nd labor be filed? I had heard that there is a policy of one PERM per company per employee. Does that not apply if the new job with the same company is substantially different. That's right. Second PERM can be filed for same employee at same company if first PERM is already approved (not pending) and second PERM is for a "substantially different" position.

    Would you please elaborate on "substantially different". If the job title is different and job duties are very different, would that qualify as "substantially different". I have been thinking about doing the same. This is not well defined. In my case, the second PERM was for a position in a different O*NET category and a different job zone, and this was considered "substantially different" by DoL. My guess would be that if the two positions are different O*net codes, you should probably be fine (this is a guess only - please consult your attorney).

    Is there any issue when 1st labor was not a PERM labor and 2nd labor is going to be PERM labor and both from same employer ?Sorry, I don't have any experience in that area, so I can't comment.





    hairstyles cat in hat book cover. Cat In The Hat Book Pictures cat in hat book pages. cat in the hat clips
  • cat in the hat clips



  • chanduv23
    03-05 10:02 AM
    As per my understanding here is how it is supposed to work

    - One ONLY has to say whether he/she is Authorized to work for any employer in an unrestricted manner

    - One ONLY has to say if he/she has a security clearance

    - One ONLY has to say if he/she needs a visa sponsership now or in future

    - Certain jobs may need that one has to be a US Citizen (not sure about this) - but there must be a valid reason as to why the job needs a US Citizen

    Once an employment is offered, the employee has upto 72 hours from the day of joining to provide proof of work authorization and complete the i 9 form. The authorization must be original and the employer must verify this and take a copy and place it in the employee's folder.

    Desi3933 or IV Attorneys - please pass on your comments.

    This is very important because - due to economy, a lot of employers are coming up with arbitrary rules and applying arbitrary filters and will continue to do so as long as it is not challenged.





    Munna Bhai
    03-28 04:13 AM
    hey! why it is like that?? last month, feb 15 08, the processing date was July 31, 2007 and how come now updated mar. 15 and the processing date became june 08, 2007??? WHY?? my friend got her gc already, hers date was july 19...she got her gc!!so wats up with that!!Do you think they will send mine (july 22)?im so upset!pls reply soon!

    pd's
    January 15, 2008: from April 07.. it became July 19
    February 15, 2008: from July 19... it became July 30
    March 15, 2008: from July 30... it became JUNE 08, 2007???????????

    Do you think it was just a typographical error that it must be August 08, 2007 instead of June???

    this is the link to nebraska service center
    https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC

    I NEED YOUR COMMENT REPLIES.

    what's your PD?? and which country you are from? Need more information to let me know whether you will get GC soon or not.





    Neocrack
    04-19 11:31 PM
    I had the same situation:
    1. On the application form list your parents name as you want it. They will print the new name on the renewal passport. (I was not asked for any additional documents)

    2.To add your spouses name on the passport you will have to give a copy of the marriage certificate and your spouses passport as part of the application form (I had applied in person).