Popular Post

jacqueline laurita young

images Jacqueline Laurita, jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita is
  • Jacqueline Laurita is



  • pappu
    06-12 01:49 PM
    kumarc123 I merged your thread + created a redirect with this one because of duplicate post and same discussion on your post in 2 places.

    Will respond to your other post soon. Pls look at us as people like you rather than venting against us for everything.





    wallpaper Jacqueline Laurita is jacqueline laurita young. and Jacqueline Laurita
  • and Jacqueline Laurita



  • logiclife
    02-01 02:06 PM
    Can we get License renewed using EAD and not having H1?.

    Driver's licenses are issued by state and governed by state laws and regulations. Check your state DMV and find out.

    In about 12 states, even illegals can obtain driver's licenses. However, most states are tightening rules and need to see your I-94 to prove your legal presence.

    EAD is for work authorization and doesnt prove legal presence. Legal presence is proved by I-94. Regardless of how you enter into USA, with H1 stamp or with AP, you will have an I-94.

    In any case, check your DMV.





    jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita and
  • Jacqueline Laurita and



  • indianabacklog
    10-24 08:10 AM
    YOU ARE INDEED LUCKY! I THOUGHT THE CURRENT PRIORITY DATE for EB3 WORLD is August 2002. MAYBE THERE ARE NO MORE 2002-2005 WAITING FOR EB3 WORLD. THEY NEED TO REVISE THE VISA BULLETIN. HOPE I WILL BE PICKED NEXT....MY LC WAS FILED JAN. 2006...A MONTH AHEAD OF YOU.

    Just to let you know there are EB3 ROW still waiting. My priority date is November 2002 and applied for AOS in May. No rhyme or reason to this process it would seem.

    Cannot imagine I am the only old PD still waiting while people who applied four years later get their green cards.





    2011 and Jacqueline Laurita jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita, Teresa
  • Jacqueline Laurita, Teresa



  • red200
    02-06 02:47 PM
    Vinod,
    were you able to contact the first employer ? abt this 140
    Hope fully its a mistake



    more...


    jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita picture
  • Jacqueline Laurita picture



  • sargon
    08-24 03:44 PM
    Hi,

    I filed my I485 in Texas service center because at the time of filing it I was living in a state which was in TSC's jurisdiction. The application is still pending in TSC.

    I have not filed any AP so far. I am filing it first time now.

    Now I have moved to a state which is in Nebraska Service Center's jurisdiction. So should I file my AP in NSC or in TSC?





    jacqueline laurita young. member Jacqueline Laurita
  • member Jacqueline Laurita



  • Caliber
    03-19 03:05 PM
    Instead of finding his faults, wouldn't it be easier to show some empathy to the point he is raising?

    IV has to do something specifically for EB3 I soon or else we'll lose the confidence of a lot of supporters. 2001...are you kidding me?

    We could not even pool $10K for FOIA. For lobbying, one needs lots and lots of money in the range of 100K -200K. What can IV do? Can you explain what you mean by "something'? if all of us EB3's can pool 100K, then we can request IV to do "SOMETHING". Hope every one understands this.



    more...


    jacqueline laurita young. co-star Jacqueline Laurita
  • co-star Jacqueline Laurita



  • willgetgc2005
    10-12 04:05 PM
    Guys,


    Let us differentiate ourselves. Legal immigrants include people who come here on family based PR petitions. We are Highly skilled legal Immigrants.


    IMHO, WE SHOUD USE "WE ARE HIGHLY SKILLED LEGAL IMMIGRANTS" INSTEAD OF "LEGAL IMMIGRANTS". Going by what is happening in the hill and elsewhere, this distinction will work favorably for us.


    PAPPU, others, comment. Let us all be consistent.




    I used the subject line: US immigration system: problems faced by legal immigrants

    thanks for taking the lead on this issue.





    2010 Jacqueline Laurita and jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita,
  • Jacqueline Laurita,



  • sanju
    12-31 04:09 PM
    When shastras were written, it was estimated that the world population is 32 million (I think its 8 million) or whatever that number is. Like when you say Namsate, it means "the God in me Salutes the God in you". As per shastras, god exists in every human being. So thats why that million number. It doesn't mean that there are 30 million gods, which is the litteral meaning of the text. Writings from olden times is just someone's interpertation of what they "understood" about God. Its NOT the final word. Human understanding of the nature and our surroundings have gotten better over thousands of years. Just like, we know how to cook food instead of eating raw meat. Wouldn't it make sense for the religions to EVOLVE, as we learn new things? But the "protector of religion" wants us to continue to live at the knowledge level of humans who existed thousands of years back, its just like asking us to eat raw meat. Will you eat raw meat just because our ansestors used to eat raw meat. If not, then why follow the same believes, haven't we learned anything new about God in the last thousand years. We all must be really poor intellectually to not leanr anything more about our creator in last thousand years. Maybe we should pity ourselves and get back to following the our same old religion.



    .


    2.As per Hindu shastra there 30 Million Gods+some(or one) for Christians+some(or one) for Muslims+few more for different people -- who is correct GOD here and whom should we follow.



    more...


    jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita,
  • Jacqueline Laurita,



  • maine_gc
    05-21 03:44 PM
    My I140 is pending at TSC from Apr 2007. No RFE. Called the CS and opened an SR in jan 08 and i got the standard reply. My Attorney opened another SR in May. Hoping to get some information on my case from TSC this time
    I think all these processing times are unreal and who knows how they process these cases (may be GOD)





    hair Jacqueline Laurita, Teresa jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita picture
  • Jacqueline Laurita picture



  • ocpmachine
    10-15 11:11 AM
    Guys,

    I efiled my AP on 9/5/10 @NSC and it was approved today after requesting expediting on 10/5/10 based on financial loss, I have a business transaction back home for which i need to be present and provided all supporting documentation related to that.

    This is what is think is more effective than contacting senators/Ombudsman for expediting, resend all the I-131 supporting documentation,proof of emergency/loss, 2 photos and include a cover letter with bold colorful fonts requesting expediting to the same address you sent your app earlier (btw, i used the USCIS center courier address and not PO Box address), i believe this way your app goes to the officer quicker and he has all the documents needed to approve your case right away if you qualify for expediting, i have used this process more than once and know it works at least for me....you have tried other methods, why not try this as well!

    Good Luck!



    more...


    jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita will
  • Jacqueline Laurita will



  • indian111
    06-30 11:35 AM
    AP apporved in 25 days from TSc

    E-filed on May 22nd and got approval on June 27.





    hot Jacqueline Laurita picture jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita,
  • Jacqueline Laurita,



  • Openarms
    05-27 03:26 PM
    who are those interest groups that are able to introduce VISA recapture bill?? kudos for them...



    more...


    house Jacqueline Laurita walks jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita
  • Jacqueline Laurita



  • mallu
    06-15 08:30 PM
    We are being squeezed all along the way... Did you notice I140 retrogression? Think about those who got stuck at labor, then 140, then I485, then name check...

    Did you hear that they were trying to eliminate AC21? So what's the benefit of filing I485 considering all the backlogs? Without AC21, you still have to start all over again should you lose your job.

    Pure stupidity on those bueracrats!

    Some employers are having merry time. "Dedicated" employees working for N number of years without any major promotion ( also i have seen employers in dilemma because cannot promote employee to a mangerial position ).





    tattoo member Jacqueline Laurita jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita Lost
  • Jacqueline Laurita Lost



  • swo
    09-16 05:32 PM
    I think Wah Wah is confused by the differences between 'retrogression' and 'backlog'. Of course, you are right that the PDs are not likely to go much further back (I think USCIS took a conservative approach after July - note they are still issuing visas to those with non-current PDs but are using the bulletin to limit incoming new filings). However, if 20 million applied in July the coming backlogs would be horrendous, even though priority dates would not necessarily need to go back further.

    However, in a sense, if the backlog is perpetual, and let's say the PD never really moves forward by more than, for example, one month, in the next 10 years (I'm picking extremes to make my point) then the effective retrogression at that point would be greater than say todays.

    Phew. Anyway, I think that's what he was on about!

    :)


    You are just repeating yourself. Show me the logic why entering all apps will retrogress the PD?

    Let me give a concrete example. For India EB2, why would the PD not move from, say, April 2004 to January 2005, even if, say, 20 million people with priority date at 2006 apply for I485?

    Understand the procedure first. With a better idea of applications in pipeline, you will see the PD movement to be better predicted, not retrogression.




    Why is it obvious? Show me the logic man!! Instead of just stating it. If ROW was current till now on some category, everybody who were supposed to file would have filed. Why would it get retrogressed. You understand that only the unused ROW numbers trickle over ot India/China etc.


    So, you are saying you don't have a logic. You are speculating and saying only time will prove you right? Eh?



    more...


    pictures co-star Jacqueline Laurita jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita picture
  • Jacqueline Laurita picture



  • sertha1
    06-25 09:08 AM
    I sent you a private message. Could you please respond?

    H1 was approved some time last year and H1B started from 10/1/2006.





    dresses Jacqueline Laurita, jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita,
  • Jacqueline Laurita,



  • kondur_007
    08-10 09:12 PM
    EB1 Current all across
    EB2 India and China Dec 2006
    EB3 Unavailable

    Just a prediction:D



    more...


    makeup Jacqueline Laurita, jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita walks
  • Jacqueline Laurita walks



  • burnt
    06-20 07:50 PM
    Hi Friends - Can someone give the list of documents & fees that are needed for AP renewal?





    girlfriend Jacqueline Laurita Lost jacqueline laurita young. Jacqueline Laurita,
  • Jacqueline Laurita,



  • nixstor
    04-16 03:37 PM
    Nixtor, If you are Indian it seems to me you have not visited India for long time now. India�s IT story started as back office. But now that�s not true any more. The Kind of projects the big IT firms like Infosys, Wipro & Satyam are doing and no sub standard than the projects U.S. big I.T. firms are doing. But I do agree with you 100% it is a far dream that India can ever be at the top of the world. It is my personal opinion too. I think the current surge is temporary which was mainly brought in by a government which ruled India between 1999 & 2004. What we are seeing now is momentum of the good things they did. The current government which is highly inefficient & corrupt is going to give way to more corrupt & more inefficient government and everything is gonna fall like a deck of cards.

    We do not have to go and sit down in their helluva offices to figure out what the heck is going on. My point is simple. As long as all the so called companies simply write software,provide services to US companies its back office. How much of software written is for native use? How much of the revenue generated by these companies is Indian based? With out infrastructure and manufacturing growing at at least 10% of the other growths people dream about, its nothing but a deck of cards doomed to fall any time. Enough of my rant.





    hairstyles Jacqueline Laurita will jacqueline laurita young. BRAVOJacqueline Laurita takes
  • BRAVOJacqueline Laurita takes



  • roseball
    02-06 03:50 PM
    Vinod,

    This is the thread that was created by administrator.

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum16-iv-agenda-and-legislative-updates/1059335-announcement-iv-would-like-to-help-with-ac21-cases.html#post1409417

    You can try posting there or you can contact administrator.

    Do keep us in the loop on what happens.

    I would also check if your original GC sponsoring employer (Company A) is not involved in any fraud investigations by USCIS. In which case, USCIS can revoke an approved I-140 without any notice on the basis of fraud, which would automatically lead to your I-485 denial. I-140 online status may or may not change in such cases. Your case being in extended review is raising some flags. Do you know anything about the kind of extended review that was going on. Your lawyer on file, as well as you should get a copy of the notice. Make sure no communication was sent to the lawyer from Company A. Sometimes USCIS does not update the lawyer information even though a new G-28 is submitted. You will have to just wait for the denial notice. Send an email to info at immigrationvoice dot com so IV can get in touch with you to help.





    gc_kaavaali
    05-21 01:00 PM
    TSC I-765 for pending I-485 adjustment application is 'Feb 15th 2008'...last month it had 'Jan 29th 2008'...only moved 16 days...it is really weird...how much time they take to process may applications...mine will be expired on Aug 16th 2008...i am scared now..i am working on EAD.





    pappu
    04-11 07:52 PM
    Thanks a lot. This is what we should all be doing in this down time so that we don't have to worry every month running a funding drive and have enough to aggresively push our provisions in the coming months.